FeaturesGuidesDocumentationPricingGet Started

LocalToLink vs ngrok

Feature comparison between LocalToLink and ngrok for local development tunneling — honest pros and cons.

Quick comparison

| Feature | LocalToLink v1.0 | ngrok | |---------|------------------|-------| | Install | npx localtolink | Binary / npm / brew | | Account required | No (anonymous) | Yes | | HTTPS | Automatic | Automatic | | WebSocket | Yes | Yes | | Custom subdomain | No (v1.5 Pro) | Paid plans | | Request inspector | No | Yes | | Request replay | No | Yes | | Terminal QR code | Yes (--no-qr to hide) | No | | Auto port detection | Yes | Manual or config | | Free session limit | 2 hours, 1 GB | Varies by plan |

When ngrok wins

Request inspection and replay are ngrok's core differentiators. If you need to:

ngrok is the better tool. LocalToLink v1.0 deliberately does not include a request inspector — use server-side logging or ngrok for that workflow.

When LocalToLink wins

Zero-friction anonymous tunnels:

npx localtolink

Good for: quick webhook testing, client previews, OAuth callback testing, mobile device testing.

Pricing

| | LocalToLink | ngrok | |-|-------------|-------| | Free | Anonymous, 2h sessions | Limited free tier | | Paid | v1.5 Pro ($5/mo planned) | Multiple paid tiers |

Migration tip

Both tools give you a public HTTPS URL. Swap the URL in your webhook/OAuth config — no code changes in your app.

Limitations

LocalToLink v1.0 does not offer:

See Best ngrok Alternatives for other options.

Try it now

Start a tunnel from your project directory — no account required.

$ npx localtolink

See the full CLI reference for flags and exit codes.

LocalToLink CLI 1.0.1 — verified 2026-09-05